Subtle

        Energy

            Activation

                Device……...S. E. A. D.

(a Multiwave Oscillator)

                        Subtle Energy Activation Device (SEAD)

                                            A Multiwave Oscillator

We wish to thank Robert Shane without whose contribution this review and analysis would not

have been possible.

• Introduction

• Contraindications

• Cautions

• Practical Experience

• Conclusions

• References

• Appendix A

o Multiwave Oscillators

• Appendix B   (1927 Article on MWO) Be sure to check this out. Click on it.

o “Curing Cancer with Ultra Radio Frequencies”, by George Lakhovsky

·        Body Composition

·        A New Method

·        The Radio Cellulo-Oscillator

·        The Length of Treatment

• Appendix C

o Research Resources and Studies on the Benefits of Bioelectric

Technologies

Introduction

As we move into the 21st  Century, there is an increasing understanding of the energetic nature of

the human body and it’s role in illness or health. The emerging field of energetic medicine seeks

to utilize the body’s innate potential to heal itself. Through the work of many researchers over

the last century, various devices have been developed that tap this energetic resource to restore

health to the body.

In his book "The Secret of Life", Dr. George Lakhovsky, the researcher who developed the

Multiwave Oscillator, formulated the theory that the DNA of every cell will receive and transmit

energies of specific wavelengths. He postulated that since the DNA is shaped as a coil it

essentially acts as an antenna. His research found that cells would respond to frequencies in the

high hundred thousand Hz up to several billion Hz. Not knowing what each cell's resonate

frequency would be, Lakhovsky created his multiwave oscillator such that millions of

frequencies were generated and each cell could resonate with its appropriate frequency and

receive the energy to maximize its cellular potential. As each cell reached optimum potential

they could return to optimum function and the body could then defend itself from pathogenic

influences and neutralize, reverse and prevent its own disease processes. This shotgun approach

is in stark contrast to that developed by Royal Rife, another pioneering researcher of energetic

medicine. His “Rife Machine” requires knowledge of the individual frequency specific to any

given organism and then driving that frequency with enough power that the pathogen self

destructs.

Lakhovsky's original equipment consisted of two large coil antennas that were driven by

powerful frequency generators while a person sat between the coils. As the research continued it

was determined that the receiving antenna was not required since the person receiving the energy

would act as the receiving antenna. Further developments in the technology added plasma tubes

filled with noble gases, which generated many more harmonics of the frequencies providing a

much higher likelihood of beneficially affecting the cells.

The equipment was originally powered by 60 Hz alternating current. Even though these instruments
seem more powerful and the plasma tubes are brighter and more active, some sensitive people
are stressed by the 60-cycle noise component. Consequently a direct current (DC) model was
developed, known as the Subtle Energy Activation Device (SEAD). It resolves some of the problems
of the earlier devices while delivering consistently positive results.

Contraindications

Do not touch the plasma tubes to avoid being shocked by the high voltage stimulating them.

Also:

1. Do not use if pregnant.

2. No one with a pacemaker or other electronic life support system should use a multiwave

oscillator because the fields that are generated might interfere.

3. Start slowly since using the system too long initially could cause a Herxheimer reaction

(healing crisis) due to the die off of pathogenic organisms.

Cautions

There are several companies making different models of the Multiwave Oscillator. Most of them

are beneficial. However, some of the units are still being made according to the original designs

with large coil antennas that often require massive amounts of power and special wiring to

supply the power.  Also, some units are exorbitantly priced. The SEAD unit appears to be

competitively priced for a newer design DC model and does not require special high-powered

circuits.

Practical Experience

1. Since animals do not have preconceived bias or opinions, one of the most interesting

cases involves a client's dog. This dog had been traumatized as a puppy, prior to coming

to its current family, and was terrified by thunder and lightning, going into uncontrolled

quivering and cowering. When the owners got their SEAD unit they started using it in

their bedroom. As soon as the device was turned on the dog would race into the bedroom,

jump on the bed and lie as close as possible to the SEAD. After several weeks of this,

another thunderstorm arrived. Interestingly the dog, which had been sleeping at the time,

lifted her head, calmly looked around and went right back to sleep without any of the

quivering normally experienced. The SEAD seems to have affected the emotional level

of awareness and facilitated the release of those deeply imbedded fears.

2. Another husband and wife received their unit and found that they had to start with 1-

minute sessions in order to avoid having detox reactions. As they slowly worked up to

20-minute sessions they began to time their meditation sessions with the 20-minute timer

on the SEAD. They reported that their meditations were much deeper with fewer

distractions and that they reached higher states of consciousness more easily and quickly.

3. Other benefits reported by users include reduction in joint pains, fewer colds and thus,

more energy, improved mental clarity and recall.

Conclusions

The SEAD is a quick method to recharge the cells to their optimal potential so that normal

function can return and the body can more efficiently defend itself from the continuing onslaught

of microorganisms and stress. This device can be used in several ways:

1. As a preventative maintenance system to help the body to not succumb to energetic and

microbial threats;

2. For practitioners it can be used at the beginning of a session to help the client’s body *

absorb enough energy that it can receive a therapy, as well as maintain and integrate it

after the session; *

3. For people who already have sufficient energy at the beginning of a session the SEAD

can be used at the end of a session to lock the therapy in and provide more energy to

ensure a lasting correction.

References

Note: Much of this material was obtained from online sources and the owner's manual. (See

Appendices)

APPENDIX A

Subtle Energy Activation Device (SEAD)

From the Owner’s Manual

A Multiwave Oscillator

Multiwave Oscillators

All cells have small electrically powered pumps inside of them whose function is to bring in

nourishment, and take out toxins. Healthy cells, according to Nobel Prize winner Otto Warburg, have

cell voltages of 70 to 90 millivolts.

Due to the constant stresses of modern life and our toxic environment, cell voltage tends to drop as we

age or get sick. As the voltage drops, the cell is unable to maintain a healthy environment for itself.

Imagine going into a house where the power is out. The water pumps wouldn't operate so the toilets

wouldn’t work. There would be no running water, therefore no showers or baths or doing dishes. The

refrigerator wouldn't work so there wouldn't be any food to eat, and the food that was in there would go

bad. Add to that a garbage man strike, and now garbage is piling up. As you could guess, anyone

living in that house would probably get sick.

It is the same for the cells of the body. Without enough energy to operate, the cells become toxic and

malnourished.

Then, when presented with an infectious organism, whether it is the virus that causes cancer, or the

common cold, they have lost the vitality to resist.

If the electrical charge of a cell drops to 50 millivolts, a person has chronic fatigue and gets sick often.

If the voltage drops to 15 millivolts, the cell becomes cancerous. The fastest way to raise cell voltages

is with a device called a MultiWave Oscillator (MWO). Georges Lakhovsky invented MWO’S in the

early 1900’s. Dr. Lakhovsky discovered that healthy cells acted like little batteries and found out how

to recharge them (raise their voltages). He found that transmitting energy in the range between 750,000

hertz and 3,000,000,000 hertz raised the cell's voltage.

He had great results with all types of diseases including cancer. Not only was his MWO able to return

sick cells (and people) to health, but also those who used it regularly noticed that they never got sick

anymore.

15 years later, Royal Rife, the inventor of the Rife machine had an idea. If all cells have a frequency

that they can be charged at, what would happen if you isolated that frequency and sent it more energy

than it could handle? He surmised that just like overcharging a battery, the cell could be made to

explode. Rife was right, and spent many years discovering the frequencies at which viruses and bacteria

could be destroyed.

In this sense, a Rife machine is the exact opposite of a MWO. They both rely on the same principle,

that is, that life forms can absorb radio wave energy. The MWO uses that principle to strengthen the

healthy cells of the body so that they can resist disease. A Rife machine uses the principle to destroy

microorganisms that are causing problems.

Rife machine's and MWO's work hand in hand: Rife, destroying the infection, MWO’s, strengthening

the body, so that if it is exposed to the infection again, the body will be able to resist it.

While a Rife machine is able to destroy any infection, it can only do so when the frequency is known.

For example, certainly viruses cause Hepatitis and AIDS, but the frequencies are unknown at this time.

Therefore a Rife machine will be of little use to people infected with these viruses.

A MWO on the other hand does not rely on knowing the right frequency since all frequencies are put

out simultaneously. It is no surprise now that excellent results with Hepatitis and AIDS have been

reported with MWO’s. Although blood tests show that the infectious material is still present, the

clients report no symptoms from the disease. This is to be expected, since the infection is not being

destroyed, but the cell is being made strong enough to resist it.

In a similar way, everyone has been exposed to the oral variety of the Herpes virus. However, the virus

normally lies dormant in the body. Only when a person is under stress does the virus flare up and show

as blisters on the lips. We carry manythousands of infections in our body in a dormant state. As long as

we are healthy (high cell voltages), these infections stay dormant. In this way a MWO can prevent our

susceptibility to diseases of all kinds.

In some situations, a disease is not caused by an infection. Take Alzheimer’s disease or fibromyalgia.

There are no infections currently associated with these diseases but are probably caused by toxicity and

imbalanced metabolism. A MWO may be of assistance here by helping the body detox, and giving it

enough energy to heal it's chronic metabolic imbalances.

Rife machines and MultiWave Oscillators are two powerful technologiesfromthepast tohelpuswiththe

diseasesof the present.

Georges Lakhovsky developed and presented the idea that each cell in the human body works as

a micro-cellular oscillator with energy fields resonating with a “twisted filament” (like a tiny

“oscillator”) in the neuclei of living cells. The cell acts like a transmitter and receiver of radio-

electric waves that produce an energizing effect. With help from Nikola Tesla, he built the first

Multiple Wave Oscillator (MWO) in the mid-1920’s. He applied for a U.S. patent (#1,962,565)

and received it in 1934.

Lakhovsky, unfortunately, died in 1942 at the age of 72. His patent expired in 1951 and is now

readily available in the public domain. The MWO and other similar devices continued to be

used in clinics throughout Europe after his death, but the technology seems to have been almost

forgotten in America. After achieving a 98% success rate over an 11 year period, it's more than a

bit curious as to why his work was suddenly withdrawn from use and patients told treatments

were no longer available. MWO’s have been documented to be of value in treating cancer,

arthritis, and other illnesses.

Lakhovsky's goal when designing the Multiple Wave Oscillator was to produce and transmit a

full spectrum of harmonic frequencies within the body, allowing each cell to resonate with the

appropriate frequency. Cells that were sick would be entrained by the correct harmonics,

bringing them into a normal state so they could heal themselves through natural processes. With

the proper resonant frequencies, normal mechanisms of detoxification could work to bring about

greater health and well being.

Lakhovsky recognized the nucleus of each cell in the body as an oscillator in resonance with

(controlled by) the cosmic rays that Nikola Tesla often spoke about. The continuous

bombardment of cosmic radiation from space is very different from conventional radio

frequencies commonly used today. The basic thought is that the cell structures in the body are

blocked, impeding the flow of cosmic radiation, allowing poor eating habits, toxic items, stress,

etc., to cause improper functioning. The MWO acts as an entrainment device that allows cosmic

radiation to flow without interruption through the cells, allowing (and stimulating) proper

function and health.

Lakhovsky recognized the fact that the universe is basically energetic in

nature, i.e., everything is energy, vibrating at its own particular frequency. If you produce

enough harmonics at a high enough level, they will affect the cells in the body. And, there will

never be a shortage of cosmic energy flow from the universe, so our only real problem is

reversing blockages and removing the high levels of toxemia that tend to exist in most of us,

causing poor health.

Nikola Tesla and Lakhovsky, in collaboration, both produced high frequency coil systems, which

resulted in the MWO.  Both were building devices, which emitted unique oscillations, which

Tesla called non-Hertzian waves. Lakhovsky used a resonant, bi-polar Tesla coil as a power

supply, which means one tuned, primary coil was used to place two distinctive secondary coils

into resonance at the same time. A double spark gap (similar to using two spark plugs from an

automobile) was used to produce the harmonics. The double gap was used to spread the

discharge over two simultaneously sparking gaps to more precisely adjust the timing and

consistency of the energy discharge. This is important because the spark gap is the point where

the flow of energy is blocked while the discharge from the second spark gap is hitting the coils
and antennas.

The spark gap is also an important component in Tesla technology because the specific
character of the discharge across the gap may hold the key to producing the proper
non-Hertzian component for optimum performance.  [The SEAD has three spark gaps.]

The oscillations of the resonant coils in Lakhovsky’s MWO are coupled to a unique antenna,
which consists of concentric rings of nearly complete circles. Lakhovsky’s original antenna used

hollow, tubular, metallic elements. Each ring is tuned to a specific musical note. The outer ring
starting with a “C”, where the combined set of concentric rings produces a full harmonic scale.
Each outer ring is harmonically coupled to one of the bipolar secondary coils, causing the entire
set of rings on the antenna to oscillate. There are two antennas, placed a few feet apart to spread
the harmonic energy between them. They produce a full scale of harmonics, generally above
500,000 Hz and reaching into the billions of Hz (Gigahertz). This huge amount of harmonic energy
allows cells to regain their proper oscillation with incoming cosmic energy.

The person being treated sits in a wooden (non-metallic) chair between the antennas. Lakhovsky

stated that approximately 15 minutes would produce roughly 90% of the benefit for an entire

day. Another 15 minutes would add a bit more, but more time simply wasn’t needed. Eight

hours of use wouldn't produce a significant difference in results.

APPENDIX B

The following article by Georges Lakhovsky appeared in Radio News Magazine in 1925. In it,

Lakhovsky discusses his theory of healing and his experiments with his RADIO-CELLULO

OSCILLATOR (commonly known as the MWO, or MultiWave Oscillator). This article is

included for educational and historical purposes only.

CURING CANCER WITH ULTRA RADIO FREQUENCIES

By Georges Lakhovsky

A new and important application of very short wave-lengths is described in this article by one of

the leading French scientists.

The new application of short wave-length oscillations described in this article is one of the most

important ever found, and we are pleased to present to our readers this article

by Mr. George Lakhovsky, the well known French scientist.

The experiments described were carried out in collaboration with several doctors and scientists

of high standing and it seems from results obtained, that the very high frequency treatments will

play an important role in the future.

We shall publish in a later issue another article on this new system, together with the effects of

ultra radio frequencies in the treatment of other diseases in human beings.

Since November, 1923, I have published in various technical and radio publications, several

papers in which I explained my theory that the instinct or special feeling, which permits birds to

direct themselves in space, is only the results of the emission and reception of rays by living

beings.

While developing this theory, I explained how thoroughly I was convinced that science will

discover, some day, not only the nature of microbes but the radiation which they produce, but

also a method of killing disease bacilli within the human body by means of the proper radiations.

The researches I have made by means of special apparatus have shown such results, that I

believe my theory to be correct. This theory is that life is born from radiations, kept going by

radiation and suppressed by any accident producing the destruction of the oscillatory

equilibrium, especially by the radiations of certain microbes, which suppress those of the weaker

cells.

Before going any further in our reasoning, it is necessary, in order to present the facts to the

uninitiated reader, to imagine what oscillations really are.

The motion of a pendulum will be used for this explanation. When a pendulum is displaced from

the position of equilibrium, it moves back and forth producing what are known as synchronous

oscillations, until the energy stored is entirely exhausted. By means of a motor, a spring, or an

electro-magnet, it is possible to keep the motion of the pendulum of constant amplitude,

producing undamped oscillations.

If, on the contrary, the source of power is removed, the oscillations die down and it is necessary

not only to re-apply the power sustaining the oscillations, but also to furnish additional energy to

start the pendulum in motion. This oscillation of a pendulum reproduces exactly what happens in

the cells of a living being.

Body Composition

Our organs are composed of cells formed of protoplasm containing various mineral matters and

acids, such as iron, chloride, phosphorous, etc. It is by the combination of these elements that

the cells detect outside waves and vibrate continuously at a very high frequency, probably higher

than the period of X-rays or over all other vibrations known and measured today.

The amplitude of cell oscillations must reach a certain value, in order that the organism be strong

enough to repulse the destructive vibrations from certain microbes.

The astrophysicians are actually carrying out experiments of great interest on the existence of

vibrations, which have been called penetration rays and of which the frequency is higher than

that of X-rays and of the alpha, beta and gamma rays of radium.

Such rays, according to the theory, are produced by the earth itself and some others come from

outside space.

Accurate measurements have proven the correctness of this theory. Therefore, it is quite

permissible to believe that these penetration rays, or at least some of them, produce the vibratory

motion of living cells and consequently their life.

For instance, let us suppose a cell vibrates at a certain frequency and a microbe vibrates at a

different frequency; the microbe begins to fight the cell through radiation, and sickness is started.

If the cell cannot repel the stronger vibrations and if the amplitude of its own vibration is forced

to decrease, the microbe gains in amplitude and its vibrations begin to decrease and stop those of

the cells, bringing on dangerous sickness or death.

If, on the contrary, the living cell is started vibrating with the proper amplitude by inside or

outside causes, the oscillatory attack is repulsed. Such is my theory.

The problem is somewhat similar to the situation in which a rescuer finds himself when, coming

to help a friend in a dangerous situation, finds himself fighting hand to hand against strong

aggressors. The rescuer does not dare to fire his gun, fearing to harm his friend mixed up with

the aggressors in the melee.

Similarly, microbes and healthy cells are all exposed to electric or radioactive action, which

could be used to destroy the unwanted rays and it is difficult to suppress them without harming

or killing at the same time the cells, which are to be treated. In fact, since Pasteur, scientists

have been constantly searching for a means of destroying microbes.

The great difficulty with all methods found was that in destroying the bacillae, the cell was attacked

too. The experience gained in cancer and tuberculosis treated with radium, X-rays, or ultra-violet

rays, shows how difficult is the world of the investigators.

A New Method

The remedy in my opinion is not to kill the microbes in contact with the healthy cells, but to

reinforce the oscillations of the cell either directly by reinforcing the radioactivity blood or in

producing on the cells a direct action by means of the proper rays.

During January, 1924, I began to build, according to this theory, and with the purpose

of therapeutic applications, an apparatus, which I have called the Radio-Cellulo-Oscillator, with

the firm belief that the cells vibrating at extremely short wave- lengths would find their own (ed.

frequency?) in the Hertzian waves, which have the properties of producing extremely short

harmonics.

The cell with very weak vibrations, when placed in the field of multiple radiations, finds its own

frequency and starts again to oscillate normally through the phenomenon of resonance.

This type of vibration is produced by the radio waves, which I propose to use, is harmless, unlike

those of x-rays and radium. Their application, therefore, does not present any danger for the

operator.

I exposed in front of my apparatus, during long periods, a certain number of microbes in culture,

which developed themselves normally. I, myself, have never felt the effect of these ultra radio

frequencies, although I remained for a great many days near the apparatus, during the treatment

applied to the living cells.

It is only when two living beings such as a cell and a microbe, are in contact, that the rays

produced by the Radio-Cellulo-Oscillator have any direct effect upon cellular structure.

The experiments, which I carried out at the Salpetriere Hospital in Paris, in the service and with

the collaboration of Prof. Gosset, were made with plants inoculated with cancer, and the results

were described in a paper presented on July 26, last year, before the Biological Society. The text

of this paper follows.

One knows that it is possible to produce by inoculation of Bacterium tumefaciens in plants,

tumors similar to those of cancer in animals. One of us obtained experimentally by this method,

a great number of tumors. These had various degrees of development. Some of them dry up

partially, but do not die entirely until the entire plant or at least the limb bearing the tumor dies.

Even removed by surgical methods, these tumors grew again on the sick limb.

The Radio Cellulo-Oscillator

We propose to describe in this paper, the action of electromagnetic waves of very high frequency

obtained by means of the Radio Cellulo-Oscillator of George Lakhovsky.

This apparatus produces wave-lengths of the order of two meters and less, corresponding to 150

million cycles per second.

A first plant was submitted to the effect of the radiation one month after being inoculated with

cancer; at this time small tumors of the size of a cherry stone were visible upon it. This plant was

submitted to the rays twice, for three hours each time.

During the following days, the tumors continued to grow rapidly in the same ways as those on

plants, which had not been submitted to the effect of radiations. However, 16 days after the first

treatment, the tumors began to shrink and dry up.

A few days later the tumors were entirely dried up and could be very easily detached from the

limb of the plant by merely touching them.

The drying action of the radio frequency radiations is selective and affects only the sick part of

the plant.

Even the inside sick tissues were destroyed, although they were next to healthy cells in the center

of the limb, showing that the radiations had not affected the healthy parts.

The Length of Treatment

Another plant was treated in the same way, except that it was exposed 11 times, for three hours

each time, to the radiations of the oscillator.

Sixteen days after the first exposure the tumors, which were rather large as shown in one of the

photographs, began to shrink and dry up and were easily detached from the limb exactly as in the

first case.

Again in this case, the healthy parts of the plant were not affected in the least.

A third plant exposed to the radiations for nine hours, that is, three treatments of three hours

each, was cured in the same manner as the two others.

Sixteen plants also inoculated with cancer, were left without treatment. They have tumors in full

activity, several of which are very large.

These experiments show conclusively that plant(s) inoculated with cancer can be treated and

cured by means of the ultra radio frequency vibrations, whereas surgical treatment fails.

In conclusion, I wish to call the attention of the reader to the fact that I have obtained very

conclusive results not only with a wavelength of two meters, but with longer and shorter wave-

lengths. The main thing is to produce the greatest number of harmonics possible.

Such are the results of my researches with plants. At the present time, similar experiments are

being carried out with animals and it seems that the effect on cancerous animals is the same as on

cancerous plants.

I am highly pleased to present my theory and the results of my work in a scientific review of

the United States, this great country, which has always been in the lead in the fight against this

terrible sickness, cancer, and whose sympathy and help I would greatly appreciate.

APPENDIX C

RESEARCH RESOURCES AND STUDIES ON THE BENEFITS OF

BIOELECTRIC TECHNOLOGIES

    1. Akaimine, T. Report of the Japan Committee of Electrical Enhancement ofBoneHealing.

Abstract 1981. Report showing that pulsed electromagnetic fields produce an increase in the

growth of cancer cells.

    2. American Physiological Society Neurophysiology Vol. I of The Handbook of Physiology.

1959, Chapter 1, “The Historical Development of Neurophysiology,” by Mary A. Brazier, is one

of the best and most literate accounts of this subject. This work may be found in most medical

school libraries.

    3. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 174, October 30, 1970.

    4. Arno, Peter and Feiden, Karyn, Against the Odds, Harper Collins, 1992, p. 204. Reported by

Associated Press and published in the Los Angeles Times, March 15, 1993.

    5. Ausubel, Ken, “The Silent Treatments”, New Age Journal, (September/October 1989, p.

117.

    6. Bailer, J. C., and Smith, E. M. “Progress against Cancer?” New England Journal of

Medicine 314(1986):1226.

    7. Baker, R. R. “Human Magneto reception for Navigation” In Electromagnetic Fields and

Neurobehavioral Function, edited by M. E. O'Connor and R H. Lovely. New York: Nan R. Liss,

1988.

    8.  Bassett, C. A. L., and Becker, MD, R. O Science137(1962):1063. Report that bone has a

piezoelectric effect.

    9.  Bassett, C. A. L., Pawluk, R., and Becker, MD, R. O. Nature204(1964):652. Report that

DC electrical current stimulates bone growth.

    10. Beale, Morris, Super Drug Story. Columbia Pub., Washington, D.C., 1949.

    11.  Beck, Melinda, “The Politics of Breast Cancer” Newsweek December 10. 1990.

    12. “Bone Marrow Swap in Breast Cancer Still in Question”, The London Free Press, April

19, 1999, from Associated Press and The Toronto Sun.

    13. Becker, MD, R. O. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Electronics 7(1960):202. A

description of the integrated system of direct currents in the salamander.

    14. Becker, MD, R. O., Bassett, C. A. L., and Bachman, C. H., in Bone Biodynamics,edited by

H. Frost. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1964. Theory relating piezoelectric effect in bone to its

stress-related growth.

    15. Becker, MD, R. O., and Belden, Gary, “The Body Electric, Electromagnetism and the

Foundation of Life” Science134(1961):101. Proof that the direct electrical currents in the

salamander are semiconducting in nature.

    16. Becker, MD, R. O., and Murray. D. G. ClinicalOrthopedics and RelatedResearch

73(1970):169. Complete description of the fracture-healing electrical control system.

    17. Becker, MD, R. O., et al. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research 124(1977):75. Report

that very-low-strength negative electrical currents could cause bone growth and healing.

    18. Becker, MD, R. O., and Esper, C. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research161 (1981):336.

Report that low-strength electrical currents stimulate the growth of cancer cells.

    19. Becker, MD, R. O., Calcified TissueResearch26(1978):93.

    20. Becker, MD, R. O., and Marino, Andrew A. Electromagnetism and Life (Albany, N.Y:

State University of New York Press, 1984, and in Modern Bioelectricity, edited by A. A. Marino

(New York: Marcel Dekker, 1988).

    21. Benveniste, Jackques, “What is Digital Biology?” Benveniste is a French scientist who

proved homeopathy’s truth in experiments in the late 1980’s, which brought a vehement reaction

from traditional scientists and questionable invasions of his laboratory from unqualified

‘debunkers’. At the time of this writing (2004), he is the head of the Digital Biology Laboratory

in Clamant, France.

    22. Bernstein, Sharon “DrugMakersFace EvolvingMarkets” Los Angeles Times,January 31,

1999.

    23. Bezell, Robert, “Bone Marrow Transplants May Not Work For Breast Cancer” MSNBC

web site, March 9, 1999.

    24. “Breast Cancer Quackery”, New York Post, April 20, 1999.

    25. Bird, Christopher “What Has Become of the Rife Microscope?" New Age Journal.

Boston, March 1976.

    26. Biser, Loren, The Layman's Course on Killing Cancer.

    27. Blakemore, R. Science 190(1975):377. The first paper describing the magnetic organ in

bacteria.

    28. Blood, Alan, Rife Ray Cancer Treatment and Mycoplasmas in cancer and AIDS P.O. Box128,

Nathan 4111, Brisbane, Australia.

    29. Breder, C. O. Science 240(1988):321. Aspects of psychoneuroimmunology.

    30. Broad, William and Wade, Nicholas Betrayers of the Truth: Fraud and Deceitin the Halls of

Science.

    31.Bross, Irwin, “Mathematical Models vs. Animal Models” Perspective on Animal

Research, Vol. 1, 1988. Medical Research Modernization Committee, P. O. Box 6036, Grand

Central Station. New York. NY. Dr. Bross also authored Crimes of Official Science, Biomedical

Metatechnology Press, Buffalo, NY, 1988.

    32. Brotherstone, Gordon, Image of the New World, London: Thames & Hudson, 1979. A

collection of actual writings of Amerindians describing aspects of their culture, including their

medical and healing concepts.

    33. Brown, Frank. Many papers on biological cycles, published in the 1960’s and 1970’s.

Best summary is in American Scientist 60(1972):756.

    34. Browne, Malcolm, “Unlikely Results of ExperimentPublished in Scientific Journal” TheNew

York Times,June 30, 1988.

    35. Brown, H. D., and Chattopadhyay, S. K. Cancer Biochemistry and Biophysics

9(1988):295. Review of all available scientific literature on electromagnetic fields and cancer.

    36. Brown, Raymond K. AIDS, Cancer and the Medical Establishment. Aries Rising Press, Los

Angeles, 1986.

    37. Cairns, John “TheTreatmentof Diseases and the WarAgainstCancer” Scientific American,

November 1985.

    38. “Cancer Clinics,” The Houston Post, May 9, 1990.

    39.  Cantwell, Alan, Jr. AIDS: The Mystery and the Solution. Aries Rising Press, Los Angeles,

1983.

    40. Cartmell, John W., “Cancer A Paradigm and Protocol”, Frontier Perspectives,

Spring/Summer 1997; reprinted in Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients, Feb/Mar 1996 and

again in SunCoast EGO Report, Aug/Sep 1998, P.O. Box 35500, SunCoast, FL 34278.

    41. Corner, George History of Rockefeller Institute 1901-1953. Rockefeller Institute Press,

New York, 1964.

    42. Coulter, Harris L., The Controlled Clinical Trial, Washington, D.C.: Center for Empirical

Medicine, 1991.

    43. Crane, John, A Study of Electron Therapy John F. Crane Corp., San Diego, 1978.

    44. Cullen, Ben, transcript of interview, October 15, 1959. Cohen, D. Science175(1972):664.

First report of the magnetic encephalogram (magnetic field given off by the brain).

    45. Clendening, Logan, Source Book of Medical History, New York: Dover Publications,

1942.

    46. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research141(1979):266. Two papers that summarized the

DC control system for human bone growth and the possible side effects of electrical and

electromagnetic treatments.

    47. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research 73 (1970): 169. The complete electrical control

system for the healing of bone fractures.

    48. Cohnheim, J. F. Vodesungen caber allgemeine Pathologie. Berlin: A. Hirschwald, 1877.

    49. Collier, Michael, Introduction to Grand Canyon Geology Grand Canyon, AZ: Grand

Canyon Natural History Association, 1980. This has little to do with medicine perse, but it is an

excellent, poetically written history of geology and evolution that relates to scientific attitudes.

    50. Corner, History of the Rockefeller Institute, chapter 20; S. Benison, Tom Rivers: Reflection

on a Life in Medicine and Science, An Oral Memoir (Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1967).

    51. Coyle, Michael, Advanced Microscopy for Nutritional Evaluation and Correction 1997, pp.

13, 27, 241, 246, 252, 253. Christine Baillie, A New Microscope Company/ANMC,82 Proctor

    52.  Road, Chelmsford, MA 01824.

Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept of Health, Supreme Court decision, June 25, 1990.

    53. DeMeo, James, “More FDA ‘Ban and Burn’ Actions”, September 26, 1998. obrl-

news@lists.village.virginia.edu). Postal mailing address: Orgone Biophysical Research

Laboratory, Inc., Greensprings Center. P.O. Box 1148, Ashland, OR 97520.

    54. Dibner, Bern. Luigi Galvani. Norwalk, CT: Burndy Library, 1971. A brief biography and

discussion of Galvani's observations with several illustrations by Galvani that were not

previously published.

    55. Dominique, Gerald J.: Cell-Wall Deficient Bacteria. Addison Wesley, Reading, Ma,

1982.

    56. Dusseau. J. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 30(1987):345.

    57. Eddy, David M. and Henderson, Craig, “Bone Marrow Transplants: No Breast Cancer

Miracle Cure” The Sacramento Bee, California, April 20, 1999.

    58. Eden, James, Energetic Healing, Plenum Press, 1993.

    59. “Filterable Bodies Seen With The Rife Microscope”, Science Supplement, Science,

December 11, 1931.

    60. Fishbein, Morris Fads and Quackery in Healing, pp. 299-300.

    61. Fitzgerald, Ben, Special Counsel to the Senate Committee on Interstate and Foreign

Commerce, Congressional Record Appendix, (August 3, 1953). Fitzgerald was a highly trained

attorney brought to the Senate for the investigation from the U.S. Justice Department; the report

concluded "the AMA, in direct collaboration with the National Cancer Institute and the Federal

Drug Administration, entered into a conspiracy to suppress alternative, effective cancer

treatments."

    62. Friedenberg, Z. B., and Brighton, C. T. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery48A(1966):915

Report that human fractures, like the salamander's regenerating limb, are electrically negative.

    63. Friedenberg, Z. B., et al. Trauma11(1971):883. First report of the use of negative electrical

current to heal a human bone nonunion.

    64. Fontana, A. Journal of Immunology 129(1982):2413. Psychoneuroimmunology.

    65. Friedman, H., Becker, R. O, and Bachman, C. H. Archives of General Psychiatry

7(1962):193. DC electrical potentials influenced under hypnosis.

    66. Friedman, H. et al. Nature 200(1963):626. Report on admissions to psychiatric hospitals

related to magnetic storms.

    67. Fukada, E., and Yasuda, I. Journal of Physiology Society Japan12(1957):1158. First report of

piezoelectric effect in bone.

    68. Fukata, H. Report of the Japan Committee of Electrical Enhancement ofBone Healing.

Abstract 1981. Report that DC electrical current increases DNA synthesis in cancer cells.

    69. Green, E., and Green, A. Beyond Biofeedback. San Francisco: Delacorte Press, 1977. The

best book on biofeedback, plus much discussion of other phenomena bytheauthorities.

    70. “Giant Microscope May Yield Secrets of Bacteria World”, Los Angeles Times, June 26,

1940.

71.Glaser, Alan L., Alternative Healing and the Law.

    72. Greenberg, Daniel S. “Medical Research's Star System”, Los Angeles Times, December

14, 1998.

    73. Groner, O. C. Study of Blood in Cancer. Renouf, Montreal, 1942.

    74. Grossinger, Richard, Planet Medicine, Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books, 1987. An

encyclopedic review of medicine from prehistoric shamanism to current medical practice.

    75. Hams, Paul D., “EnergeticMedicine” Townsend Letter for Doctors, August/September

1991, p. 633.

    76. Hasson, J. Cancer Research 18(1958):262. Report of increased growth of cancer in de-

enervated portions ofthe body.

    77. “Here Is Most Powerful Microscope,” Los Angeles Times, November 27, 1931.

    78. Hess, David J., Evaluating Alternative Cancer Therapies: A Guide to the Science and

Politics of an Emerging Medical Field, Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1999, pp. 28,

30-31.

    79. Horrobin, David F. “The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of

Innovation”, JAMA, March 9, 1990.

    80. Horton, Richard, The Lancet, March 6, 1933. 78. Bernard Cohen, “Revolution in Science”.

    81. Hoyland vs. Beam Ray Corp., June 12, 1939, Judge Edward Kelly presiding, transcript,

San Diego, CA.

    82. Hume, E. Douglas, Bechamp or Pasteur, C. W. Daniel Co., Ltd., Essex, 1947.

    83. Jones, Newell, “Dread Disease Germs Destroyed by Rays Claim of S. D. Scientist”, San

Diego Tribune, May 6, 1938.

    84.  Jones, Newell, “Rife Bares Startling New Conceptions of Disease Germs”, San Diego

Tribune, May 11, 1938.

    85. Keller, Evelyn F., A Feeling For The Organism, W H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco,

1983.

    86. Kendall, Arthur & Rife, Royal, “Observations on Bacillus Typhoeus in its Filtrable State”,

California and Western Medicine, December 1931.

    87. Kendall, Arthur, “The Filtration of Bacteria”, Science, March 18, 1932.

    88. Ladas, Harold S. PhD., “TheWar On Cancer” Holistic Medicine, Vol. 3 London. 1986.

    89. Layne, M., The Koch Remedy for Cancer David Wolper TV documentary interview of

Senator Paul Douglas.

    90. Livingston-Wheeler, Virginia and Addeo, Edmund G., The Conquest of Canccer: Vaccines

and Diet Franklin Watts, 1984.

    91. “Local Man Bares Wonders of Germ Life”, San Diego Union. November 3, 1929.Holden,

C. Science 200(1978):1316. An excellent review of the mind/cancer relationship: gives an

indication of how little has been done since then.

    92. Illingworth, C. M. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 9(1974):853. Report on regeneration of

fingertips in children.

    93. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Electronics24(1977):402. Acupuncture meridians have

transmission line characteristics.

    94. Israelachvili, J., and McGuiggan, P. Science 241(1988) 995. Report of strong forces at

very close distances in liquids.

    95. Jonas, Wayne “Alterative MedicineandtheConventional Practitioners”, JAMA,March 4,

1998, v. 279, n9, p.708.

    96. Journal of Bioelectricity 1 (1982):239. This is a review of Robert Becker, MD's work on

electrical controls of regeneration.

    97. Journal of Bioelectricity (1984):105. An attempt to “put it all together.”

    98. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 43-A(1961):643. Original paper on the electrical

factors in regenerating limbs of salamanders.

    99. Krippner, S., ed. Advances in Parapsychological Research, Vol. 1, Psychokinesis(1977); Vol.2,

Extrasensory Perception(1978); Vols.3(1982) and 4 (1984), untitled, New York and London:

McFarland, Jefferson. All volumes are of great value in that they collect the best available

scientific evidence for all aspects of parapsychology.

    100. Lakhovsky, Georges, PhD, The Secret of Life.

    101. Lanzerotti, L. J. “The Earth's Magnetic Environment”, Sky and Telescope, October 1988.

Popular version of present knowledge of Earth's magnetic field complexities.

    102. Lasalandra, Michael, “Breast Cancer Studies Extend Treatment Debate” Boston Herald,

Massachusetts, April 16. 1999.

    103. Laurence, William “Trite Advances LifeRayTheory as MedicalBasis”New YorkTimes,

October 9, 1933.

    104. Lerner, E. J. “The Big Bang Never Happened”, Discover, June 1968. The concept of

magnetic rather than gravitational forces as involved in the formation of the universe.

    105. Liberman, Jacob Light: Medicine of the Future.

    106. Libet, B. The Sciences (New York Academy of Science), March-April 1989:32.

    107. Locke, David Viruses: The Smallest Enemy. Crown Pub. New York, 1974.

    108. Lynes, Barry, The Cancer Cure That Worked, Fifty Years of Suppression. 1987.

    109. Maddox, J., Randi. J., and Stewart, W., “High dilution experiments a delusion”,

Nature 334(1988):287. Report by the investigative team on Benveniste's experiments, labeling them

“delusions”.

    110. Marchione, Marilyn, “What's Next for Treatment?”, The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel,

Wisconsin, April 18. 1999.

    111.

    112.

    113.

Martin, Wayne, from an interview in The Layman's Course on Killing Cancer by Biser,

Loren, Section 33, pp. 4-5.

Mattman, Linda H. Cell Wall Deficient Forms. CRC Press. Cleveland, Ohio, 1974.

Medical Trial Technique Quarterly, Winter, 1994. 75. Tune v. Walter Reed Hospital,

602 Federal Supplement, 1935, p. 1455.

    114. Meyer, Herbert A History of Electricity and Magnetism Norwalk, CT: Burndy Library,

1972.

    115. Microwave News: Newsletter that is the only up-to-date review of all actions in the

entire bioeffects area of the whole electromagnetic spectrum. Published ten times per year;

available by subscription (Box 1799, Grand Central Station, New York, NY 10163).

    116. Miller, S. L. Science 117(1953);528. Experiment producing amino acids and peptides

from simple compounds; possible chemical origin of life.

    117. Miner, Scott E. “Pioneering Physicians Hindered”, Well Being Journal, (May/June 1996),

(P.O. Box 1542, North Bend, WA 98045).

    118. Moertel, Charles New England Journal of Medicine, 299, 1978, pp. 1049-52.

    119. Monmaney, Terence, “NobelPrizeforMedicine Goes to UCScientist” Los Angeles Times,

October 7, 1997.

    120. Morton, W. E., and Phillips. D. S., Radio Emission Density and Cancer Epidemiology in

the Portland Metro Area (Grant #R-805832, EPA). Triangle Park, N.C.: Health Effects

Research Laboratory. Report on relationship between level of FM radiation and leukemia.

    121. Moss, Ralph, The Cancer Syndrome. Grove Press. New York, 1980.

    122. Moss,RalphW., The Cancer Industry: The Classic Expose on the Cancer Establishment, 1989.

    123. Moss,RalphW., TheCancerChronicles, Autumn1998 .

    124. Moss,RalphW., TheCancerChronicles #14, February 1993.

    125. Moss,RalphW., TheCancerChronicles #30, December 1995.

    126. Natenberg, Maurice, The Cancer Blackout: Amended: A History of Denied and

Suppressed Remedies, 1762-1976. Regent House, Chicago.

    127. Nature205(1965):1050. Report of significant relationship between cosmic-ray counts and

patient behavior in psychiatric hospitals.

    128. Neergaard, Lauren, Associated Press, “Costly New Breast Cancer Treatment May Not

Work,” The Detroit News, Michigan, April 15, 1999.

    129. Nelson, K., and Holmes, L., New England Journal of Medicine 320(1989):19.

130.  New York State Journal of Medicine 62(1962):1168. First paper proposing the primitive

DC control system.

    131.

Nicholas, Robin and Nicholas, David Virology, An Information Profile. Mansell Pub.

London, 1983.

    132. Nixon, PhD., Alan C., Past President, American Chemistry Society, quoted in

Questioning Chemotherapy: A Critique of the Use of Toxic Drugs in the Treatment of Cancer by

Moss, Ralph.

    133. Nordenson, I., et al., Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 23(1984)191.

Chromosomal abnormalities in lymphocytes of humans exposed to power-frequency fields.

    134. Nordstrom, S., et al. Bioelectromagnetics 4(1983):91. Genetic defects in offspring of

power-frequency workers.

    135. Norris, P., and Porter, G. I Choose Life.Walpole, N.H.: Stillpoint Publishing, 1987. Report

of a dramatic outcome to visualization therapy.

    136. Nuremberg quote from World Medical Association, Ethics and Regulations of Clinical

Research, A. J. Levine: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1981.

    137. “Observations on Filter-Passing Forms of Streptococcus from Poliomelitis”, Proceedings

of the Staff Meetings of the Mayo Clinic, 13 July 1932.

    138. “Observations with the Rife Microscope of Filter-Passing Forms of Microorganisms”

Science. August 26, 1932.

    139. Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United States, Unconventional Cancer

Treatments– Summary and Options – Part I,Washington, D.C., 1990.

    140. Osborne, S. L., and Frederick. J. N. Journal of The American Medical Association

137(1948):1038. First report of experiments to determine whether microwaves below heating

effect could produce cataracts; none were found.

    141. “OutsidetheBeltway” Orange County Register, January 17, 1999.

142. Pawlowski, A., and Weddell, G., Nature, March 25, 1967:1234. Increased growth of

cancer in de-enervated portions of the body.

    143. Pedersin-Bjergaard. J. et al. New England Journal of Medicine 318(1988):1028. A

medical paper indicating significant cancer-producing risks of treatment with cancer-

chemotherapeutic agents.

    144. Phillips, J. B. Science 233(1986):765. Two magnetic receptors in the salamander.

    145. Phillips, J., Winters, W. D., and Rutledge, J. International Journal of Radiation Biology

49(1986):463. Report that exposure to 60-Hz electromagnetic and magnetic fields increases rate

of growth of human cancer cells.

    146. Phillips, J. Immunology Letters 13(1986):295. Report that human cancer cells exposed

to 60-Hz fields resist destruction by body's killer-type cells.

    147. Phillips, J., et al., Cancer Research 46(1986):239. Report that exposure to 6o-Hz fields

markedly increases the surface-binding sites of human cancer cells.

    148. Phillips, Richard. Letter to Lawrence W. Herbert, February 1988.

    149. Proceedings of the Ad Hoc Committee for the Review of Biomedical and Ecological

Effects of ELF Radiation (SANGUINE Report). Washington, D.C.: Department of the Navy,

Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, December 6-7, 1973.

    150. Preslock, J. P. Endocrine Reviews 5 (1984):282. Review of functions and mechanisms of

pineal gland.

    151. Ransome, “What's New In Science-The Wonderwork of 1931”, Los Angeles Times

Sunday Magazine, December 27, 1931.

    152. Rauscher, E., and Van Elise, W. Personal communication, 1987.

    153.  Reichmanis, M., et al. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Electronics22(1975):533. Original

publication showing a direct relationship between electrical measurements and acupuncture points.

American Journal of Chinese Medicine4(1976):69. Acupuncture points show increased DC electrical

conductivity.

    154. Reilly, D. T., et al., “Is Homeopathy a Placebo Response?” in Lancet, October 1986. This

is the latest and most convincing report of the ethical effectiveness of homeopathic preparations.

It includes a good bibliography as well.

    155. Relman, Arnold S. “What Market Values Are Doing To Medicine”, The Atlantic

Monthly, March 1992.

    156. Reichmanis, M., et al., Physiological Chemistry and Physics 11(1979):395. Report

done with Dr. F. S. Perry in England on the relationship between suicide and exposure to

power-line fields

    157. Richards, Evelleen "The Politics of Therapeutic Evaluation”, Social Studies of Science

(SAGE, London, Newbury Park, and New Delhi), Vol. 18 (1988).

    158. Richardson, A. W., et al. Archives of Physical Medicine 29(1948):365. First report that

microwaves could produce cataracts without heating.

    159. Rife Microscope or Facts and their Fate. Reprint #47, The Lee Foundation for

Nutritional Research, Milwaukee, WI.

    160. Rife, Royal R. History of the Development of a Successful Treatment for Cancer and

Other Virus, Bacteria and Fungi. Rife Virus Microscope Institute, San Diego, CA, 1953.

Documents and Correspondence, 1920-71.

    161. Rife, Royal R., paper dated June 1958.

    162. Rife, Royal R., paper dated 1933.

    163. Riley, V. Science212 (1981). Major paper reporting many mind/hormone relationships.

    164. Roan, Shari “TwoPros DukeIt Out OverAlternativeMedicine”, Los Angeles Times,

December 14, 1998.

    165. Robbins, John Reclaiming Our Health: Exploding the Medical Myth and Embracing the

Sources of True Healing, Tiburon, CA: H. J. Kramer, 1996, p. 268.

    166. Rose, S. M, and Wallingford, H. M. Science107(1948):457. Disappearance of cancer in

regenerating limb of salamander.

    167. Rosenberg, Stephen A., Barry, John M., and John Barry The Transformed Cell: Unlocking

theMysteries ofCancer, p. 41, 62.

    168. Rosenow, E. C., “Transmutations Within the Streptococcus Pneumococcus Group”,

Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol. 14, 1914.

    169. Royal Raymond Rife: His Incredible Cancer Cure and the Successful Campaign to Suppress His

Work!, Health Research Books :Publishing Rare and Unusual Books since 1952 : Alternative Medicine,

NaturalCures, Esoterica

    170. Sander, Christine “The Unifying Principle: Magnetic Fields and Life”. Master's thesis

(anthropology), University of California. Santa Barbara. 1984. An excellent review of data

available at the time, particularly magnetic reversals and species extinctions.

    171. Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 1914. 69. The Globe and Mail, Toronto,

Canada, June 11. 1988, p. D4 California law 17011.1 Cancer.

    172. Schoen, A. M., et al. Seminars in Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (Small Animals)1

(1986):224. A good review of veterinary acupuncture and its clinical utility.

    173. “Science's Latest Strides in War on Ills Disclosed, Development by San Diegan Hailed as

Boon to Medical Research” Los Angeles Times, November 22, 1931.

    174. Seibert, Florence B. Pebbles on the Hill of a Scientist. St. Petersburg, FL, 1968.

    175. Seidel, R. E. and Winter, M. Elizabeth “The New Microscopes”, Journal of the Franklin

Institute, Philadelphia, PA, February 1944, pp. 117-118. Reprinted in The Smithsonian

Institute's Annual Report, 1944.

    176. Semm, P. Nature 228(1980) 206. First description of magnetic sensitivity of pineal

gland.

    177. Elizabeth Robinson, “Essiac: Nature's Cure For Cancer, An Interview with Dr, Gary L.

Glum,” Wildfire, Vol. 6, No. 1, p. 48.

    178. Shultz, Marjorie Maguire, “FromInformed Consent toPatientChoice:ANewProtected

Interest” The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 95, No. 2, December 1985, pp. 293, 299.

    179. Sonea, Sorin & Panisset, Maurice A New Bacteriology. Jones & Bartlett, Boston, 1983.

    180. Spector, Harlan and Solov, Diane, “Breast Cancer Patients Still Face Choice, Transplant

Offers No Clear Benefit, Five Studies Show”, The Plain Dealer, Cleveland, Ohio, April 16,

1999.

    181. Stafford, Robert, Video interview of, October 3, 1998 in Dayton, Ohio describing his

memories in the 1950’s concerning the use of an original Rife instrument on cancer patients,

research with rats, and a federal agency's attempt to take the instrument and study the research

documents.

    182. Starr, Paul The Social Transformation of American Medicine, Basic Books, New York,

1982.

    183. Strauss, Stephen, “New Discovery MayExplain Basis forHomeopathy” The Globe and

Mail,Toronto, June 30, 1988.

    184. Szent-Gyorgyi, A. Introduction to Submolecular Biology. New York and London:

Academic Press, 1960. The classic in the field. Also see Szent-Gyorgyi’s seminal paper “A

Study of Energy Levels in Biochemistry.” Nature 14 (1941):157.

    185. “Tamoxifen: Cancer Causing Drug Approved for Healthy Women”, Life Extension,

May. 1999, p. 15, 16, 19.

    186. Thiemann, W., and Jarzak. U. Origins of Life 1(1981):85. Paper detailing method of

producing single form of organic chemical by magnetic field.

    187.  “Things that Make You Go Hmm”, Well Being Journal, January/February 1999, P.O.

Box 1542, North Bend, WA 98045-1542, pp. 19, 25.

    188. Thomas, T. L., et al. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 79 (1987):233.

Epidemiological study of electromagnetic occupational exposure and brain cancers; significant

relationships found.

    189. Tromp, S. W.Psychical Physics: A Scientific Analysis of Dowsing, Radiesthesia, and Kindred

Divining Phenomena. New York, Amsterdam, London, and Brussels: Elsevier Publishing Co.,

1949. Amajor and fascinating, book that covers all areas of the relationship between physics and

living organisms. Although the book was written some time ago, most of the material is still

pertinent.

    190. Ullman, D. Discovering Homeopathy: Medicine for the 21st Century.Berkeley, Calif.:

North Atlantic Books, 1988. The latest book on the subject, quite complete and written for the

general reader.

    191. Upledger, J. E., and Vredevoogd, J. D. Craniosacral Therapy. Seattle: Eastland Press,

1983. Excellent account of manipulation therapy. Additional information may be obtained from

the Homeopathic Education Service, 2124 Kittredge St., Berkeley, CA 94704.

    192. Visintainer, M. A., et al., Science 216(1982):437. Report on how electrical stimulation of

the brain increases the growth of cancers.

    193. Walcott, C. Science205(1979):1027. First identification of a magnetic organ in the

homing pigeon. Science205(1979):1077.

    194. Walker, M. Science224(1984):751. Associating magnetic organ with function.

    195. Wertheimer, N., and Leeper, E. American Journal of Epidemiology 109(1979):273. First

report of relationship between exposure to 6o-Hz magnetic fields from electric lines and

childhood cancer.

    196. Wever, R. ELF and VLF Electromagnetic Field Effects, edited by M. A. Persinger.

New York: Plenum Press, 1974.

    197. Whitaker, Julian Health & Healing: Tomorrow’sMedicineToday, November 1998, Vol.

8, No. 11, pp. 3-4. Phillips Publishing, 7811 Montrose Road, Potomac, MD 20854-3394. The

NEJMeditorial to which the quotation refersis: Angell, M. & Kessler, P. “AlternativeMedicine

the Risks of Untestedand Unregulated Remedies” New England Journal of Medicine, September 17,

1998; 339(12): 839-841.

    198. White, M.D., Lawrence W. “The Nazi Doctor and the Medical Community”, Journal of

Medical Humanities, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1996, p. 122.

    199. Wolinsky and Brune, as per note 10, pages xii and xiv. 21. Shari Roan and Terence

Monmaney, “Boom in Alternative Medicine Is Found,” Los Angeles Times, November 11, 1998.

    200.

    201.

Wolsky, A., Growth 42(1978): 425. Paper on regeneration and cancer.

“Virus Found 15 Years Ago-San Diegan's Cancer Cure Work May Make Cure Possible”,

San Diego Union, July 31, 1949.

    202. Wuerthele-Caspe, Virginia, and Allen, Roy, New York Microscopical Society Bulletin,

August 1948.

    203. Wuerthele-Caspe, Virginia, American Journal of Medical Sciences, December 1950.

    204. Wuerthele-Caspe-Livingston, Virginia Cancer, A New Breakthrough. Nash Pub., Los

Angeles, 1972.

    205. Yale, Arthur W., “Cancer” Pacific Coast Journal of Homeopathy, July 1940.